Aurora SPARC Linux release 2.0 (Kashmir FC3) UltraSparc IIi (Sabre) sun4u: (auroralinux corona + rathann's and rzm's FC3 updates)
binutils-2.16.91.0.2-4.sparc bison-1.875c-2.sparc dejagnu-1.4.4-2.noarch expect-5.42.1-1.sparc gcc-3.4.3-22.sparc.sparc gcc4-4.0.0-0.41.sparc.sparc glibc-2.3.5-0.fc3.1.sparcv9 glibc-2.3.5-0.fc3.1.sparc64 glibc-devel-2.3.5-0.fc3.1.sparc64 glibc-devel-2.3.5-0.fc3.1.sparc glibc-headers-2.3.5-0.fc3.1.sparc glibc-kernheaders-2.6-20sparc.sparc gmp-4.1.4-3sparc.sparc gmp-4.1.4-3sparc.sparc64 gmp-devel-4.1.4-3sparc.sparc gmp-devel-4.1.4-3sparc.sparc64 kernel-2.6.13-1.1552sp1.sparc64 package kernel-devel is not installed package kernel-smp is not installed libgcc-3.4.3-22.sparc.sparc libgcc-3.4.3-22.sparc.sparc64 libstdc++-3.4.3-22.sparc.sparc libstdc++-3.4.3-22.sparc.sparc64 libstdc++-devel-3.4.3-22.sparc.sparc64 libstdc++-devel-3.4.3-22.sparc.sparc make-3.80-5.sparc nptl-devel-2.3.5-0.fc3.1.sparcv9 tcl-8.4.7-2.sparc LAST_UPDATED: Wed Sep 28 07:54:00 UTC 2005 configure: --build=sparc64-unknown-linux-gnu --host=sparc64-unknown-linux-gnu --target=sparc64-unknown-linux-gnu --enable-__cxa_atexit --enable-shared --with-cpu=v7 --enable-languages=c,ada,c++,fortran,java,objc,obj-c++,treelang ../../xgcc -B../../ -c -g -O2 -W -Wall -Wwrite-strings -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -fno-common -gnatpg -gnata -I- -I../rts -I. -I/usr/local/src/trunk/gcc/gcc/ada /usr/local/src/trunk/gcc/gcc/ada/make.adb -o make.o +===========================GNAT BUG DETECTED==============================+ | 4.1.0 20050928 (experimental) (sparc64-unknown-linux-gnu) GCC error: | | in build_int_cst_wide, at tree.c:795 | | Error detected at make.adb:7224:23 | | Please submit a bug report; see http://gcc.gnu.org/bugs.html. | | Use a subject line meaningful to you and us to track the bug. | | Include the entire contents of this bug box in the report. | | Include the exact gcc or gnatmake command that you entered. | | Also include sources listed below in gnatchop format | | (concatenated together with no headers between files). | +==========================================================================+ Anyone else see similar? This might be related to bubblestrap so if I get no comments, I'll restart with a clean bootstrap... -- Cheers, /ChJ
