On Wed, Feb 15, 2023 at 2:30 PM Andrew MacLeod <amacl...@redhat.com> wrote: > > > On 2/15/23 14:50, Andrew Pinski wrote: > > Hi, > > While fixing PR 108354, I came across that > > ssa_name_has_boolean_range calls get_range_query with cfun as the > > argument but sometimes while in IPA passes cfun is currently nullptr. > > The question should we check the argument before calling > > get_range_query or is it a valid thing to call it with a nullptr (and > > have it return global_ranges in that case)? > > That might be ok... personally I see nothing wrong with: > > diff --git a/gcc/value-query.h b/gcc/value-query.h > index 63878968118..2d7bf8fcf33 100644 > --- a/gcc/value-query.h > +++ b/gcc/value-query.h > @@ -140,7 +140,7 @@ get_global_range_query () > ATTRIBUTE_RETURNS_NONNULL inline range_query * > get_range_query (const struct function *fun) > { > - return fun->x_range_query ? fun->x_range_query : &global_ranges; > + return (fun && fun->x_range_query) ? fun->x_range_query : &global_ranges; > } > > // Query the global range of NAME in function F. Default to cfun. > > > The client is probably going to do that anyway.
Ok. I will submit a patch which does the above; I had that patch already when I wrote the email and wanted to double check before submitting it. Thanks, Andrew Pinski > > Aldy? > >