On Mon, Sep 19, 2005 at 05:19:20PM -0700, Dale Johannesen wrote: > (Although just which subregs are safe to look under will require more > attention than I've given it, if we want this in.)
Look at MODES_TIEABLE or something. > Really I don't think this is an RA problem at all. You don't?!? Please defend that with something besides the current structure of our RA. Which is *known* to have major deficiencies. > (define_insn "*addmixed<mode>3" > [(set (match_operand:V2DI 0 "register_operand" "=x") > (subreg:V2DI (plus:SSEMODE124 > (match_operand:SSEMODE124 2 "nonimmediate_operand" "xm") > (subreg:SSEMODE124 (match_operand:V2DI 1 "nonimmediate_operand" "%0") > 0)) 0))] I absolutely will not allow you do add 5000 of these patterns. Which is what you'll need if you think you'll be able to solve the problem this way. r~
