"Giovanni Bajo" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | Gabriel Dos Reis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: | | >>> Do you suppose the idiom is common enough that VRP could special-case | >>> "arrays of size 1 at the end of a struct" ? And still obtain the | benefits | >>> of the optimisation in 99.99% of all non-variable-length-tail-array | cases? | >> | >> It makes sense to me. We could special case "arrays of size 1 at the end | of | >> the struct", and treat it as C99 flexible array members. Any other case | >> could simply be considered broken. | > | > broken with respect to what? | | | broken as in undefined behaviour?
Could you explain in detail where you see the undefined behaviour? -- Gaby
