Joe Buck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > In that sense, -Wall effectively means "all the warnings we recommend > that you use". Some people might want to argue with this, but that > is the practical effect.
A -Weverything that turned on all boolean warnings would be nice. It would be useless alone, but nice followed by a lot of -Wno-somesillywarning -Wno-anothersillywarning arguments. The idea was that you would be sure to get all the (boolean) warnings that are relevant for your project, and can give an explicit reason for each warning you don't want. It would be particularly useful when upgrading GCC, in order to be sure you get the benefit of any new boolean warnings added. The "boolean" qualifier is just to make the semantics of the option easy to define. No, I'm not working on a patch.
