On 8/31/05, Vahur Sinijärv <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote> Hi, > > No, the problem I wrote about is not fixed. I used GCC from CVS head > 30.08.2005. > I think you found a different bug, you seem to have many unneccessary > uses of secondary memory between moves from MMX reg to MMX reg. The code > I wrote about (in i386.c) allows direct moves between MMX regs, but > prevents moves directly from general registers to MMX registers, so this > cannot be the case.
Please provide a testcase and report a bug with the gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla interface. Thanks, Richard.
