On 8/25/05, Paolo Bonzini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I consider this to be less readable than the peep2 way to do it, > especially if your peephole2 had three or four instructions. And > peep2_regno_dead_p uses an array (a circular buffer) so it's more > efficient. Indeed dead_or_set_p even has a loop inside it. > > Paolo
Thanks a lot for ur help. can u give me a pointer to the origin of peep2_reg_dead_p? Regards, Ashwin
