On Mon, Aug 22, 2005 at 03:37:27PM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > It may still make sense changing the default case of > simplify_replace_rtx to invoke replace_rtx rather than returning x. But > this is unrelated, because nobody is currently passing a SET to > simplify_replace_rtx (only expressions), and you should do the same: > *you* said you want to replace on the RHS, so you really want to invoke > simplify_replace_rtx on the RHS.
Agreed. If you're concerned about the LHS, use reg_overlap_mentioned_p and abort the optimization. r~
