On Wed, Aug 17, 2005 at 12:53:14PM -0700, James E Wilson wrote: > Alternatively, patches can be put into bugzilla bug reports. This will > help make sure it won't get forgotten.
That's where we were headed, as mentioned at the end of a paragraph in the email with the patch: "Once we're happy with it, I'll put the bug report and patch into bugzilla." (I shoulda made it a separate para. :-) > In this case, since you've already sent the patch, and it looks good, > I'll try to take care of this for you. It'll only take me a moment, and "try" fits poorly with "make sure it won't get forgotten". ;-) (Sorry, the years with quality system responsibilities are showing through.) > I'm doing a v850 build now to verify it and then I plan to add it to > gcc mainline so this will be fixed for the next gcc release, gcc-4.1. If you haven't put it in bugzilla yet, I can free you up for the more important next gcc release. Regards, Erik