> > I'm not going to be able to remember exactly. It might be worth > > looking at various proprietary Unixes to see if they've got > > fprintf_unlocked, but given the date I don't think I was looking at > > one of them. My best guess is that I simply assumed glibc had it, > > since it seemed to have _unlocked variants of all the other stdio > > functions. > > zw > > Hmm, I found another interesting reference to fprintf_unlocked here: > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2003-03/msg00805.html > > In it Dave points out that hpux is missing fputc_unlocked and > therefore neither fputs_unlocked or fprintf_unlocked should transform > into fputc_unlocked. > > Dave, does hpux have fprintf_unlocked or was mentioning it a mistake?
It doesn't have either fprintf_unlocked or fputc_unlocked. Dave -- J. David Anglin [EMAIL PROTECTED] National Research Council of Canada (613) 990-0752 (FAX: 952-6602)
