On 8/2/05, Joe Buck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I suppose we could make & on an unaligned project return a void*. That > isn't really right, but it would at least prevent the cases that we know > don't work from compiling.
That sounds like a dangerous idea only because I'd expect...
int *p = &packed_struct.unaligned_member;
... to fail if unaligned_member is not an int, but if the & operator
returns a void*, it would suddenly become very permissive.
Cheers,
Shaun
