On Mon, 2005-08-01 at 14:18 +0200, Steven Bosscher wrote:
> On Monday 01 August 2005 11:44, michael meeks wrote:
> > However - the log(s) term is rather irrelevant to my argument :-)
>
> Not really. Maybe the oprofile results for the linker show that the
> behavior is worse, or maybe better - who knows :-)
> Have you looked at any profiles btw? Just for the curious...
Yes - identifying the linker and relocation processing as the root
cause of the problem isn't just a stab in the dark :-)
This flgas up as the no.1 (individual) performance killer with whatever
profiling tools you use eg.:
* vtune
* speedprof
* instrumenting top/tail of dlopen calls
etc. :-)
Regards,
Michael.
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] <><, Pseudo Engineer, itinerant idiot
