On Mon, 2005-08-01 at 01:02 +0200, Gerald Pfeifer wrote: > On Sun, 31 Jul 2005, Daniel Berlin wrote: > >> We may to want to wait until we hear about the outcome of discussion > >> on the copyright (assignment) aspects of the Wiki vs wwwdocs and gcc/doc, > > We are not the first nor the last project to have a wiki that needs to > > move documentation from the wiki to the print. > > We are not just any project... > > >> or we may be in troubles at some point in the future when we try to move > >> documentation around. > > Just like everyone else has had trouble? > > ...being an FSF project mandates stricter standards on copyright issues
For code. I have never seen such claims made for documentation, since it's much easier to remove and deal with infringing docs than code. > than "everyone else" needs to follow. Other FSF projects use their Wiki for docs. See GNUStep, GNOME, etc Or are they not "FSF enough" for you? > > Gerald
