> You may wish to read the proceedings from this year's GCC summit, where > another solution was presented by some gentlemen from Intel. For > various reasons, symbol versioning is not a useful solution to this > problem. > > No one objected to their solution in principle, AFAICT, although there > was some discussion afterwards about whether the use of strong > namespace using was really necessary
FWIW, I tried to capture some of the discussion at http://kegel.com/gcc/diary.txt
