Hi Giovanni, I have to write this in Outlook, so I don't even try to get the quoting right. Sorry. :-(
> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- > Von: Giovanni Bajo [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Gesendet am: Freitag, 22. Juli 2005 12:27 > An: Ebke, Hans-Christian > Cc: gcc@gcc.gnu.org > Betreff: Re: extension to -fdump-tree-*-raw > > @54 string_cst type: @61 strg: "wrong > type:\n\0\0\xaf\x03\x03foo\"bar" lngt: 19 > > This would not need a different special option. > But it would break applications relying on the old format. Also it wouldn't adress issues like this one: @3 modify_expr type: @5 op 0: @6 op 1: @7 Does "op" belong to the value of "type" or does it belong to the "0"? True, this doesn't make parsing impossible but the parser needs to be really specific to not fall into that trap. Having every "key-value pair" on a separate line makes parsing much easier though it isn't quite as friendly to the human reader anymore. Hans-Christian
