Andrew Haley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: [...]
| You know, the more this goes on the more I believe we should send | X3J11 a request for clarification. Perhaps X3J11 has been disbanded, | so there may be problems. But we should ask. I don't know whether X3J11 is disbanded. However, at the last meeting in Norway, the liaison (John Benito) between ISO WG14 (C) and ISO WG21 (C++) reported, if I understood him correctly, that WG14 is not considering "evolving" the C standard anymore, but I don't think they ruled out DRs. In the conversion with JSM, (when I suggested him a DR report) he said that he sees no chance of WG14 wishing to refine "volatile". The more this goes, the more it appears to me that the chain of arguments to justify current GCC behaviour goes beyond what can be inferred. -- Gaby
