On Mon, 2005-07-11 at 15:21 -0700, Joe Buck wrote: > On Tue, Jul 12, 2005 at 12:07:01AM +0200, Gerald Pfeifer wrote: > > On Mon, 11 Jul 2005, Steven Bosscher wrote: > > > Another idea that was coined on IRC is to have reviewing and commit > > > after approval rules for the user manual, but to allow patches to the > > > internals manual in without review. Is that something people are > > > willing to consider and discuss? > > > > I think this needs to be decided by the current maintainers in question > > (that is, those who generally make or review patches to the internals > > manual), but I'd be fine with that. > > What if we had a clean way to flag reviewed and unreviewed text for the > internals manual? This could be easier with a wiki; when first entered > the text might be (for example) red, and then it would change to black > when a reviewer approves it. That way material can be added quickly by > developers and we can keep track of what has been checked or not checked. > >
This is probably possible, but may be easier with other wiki software, but if that was the direction we wanted to take, i'm happy to convert us.
