* Dave Korn: > It certainly wasn't meant to be. It was meant to be a dispassionate > description of the state of facts. Software that violates the C standard > just *is* "buggy" or "incorrect",
Not if a GCC extension makes it legal code. And actually, I believe a GCC extension which basically boils to -fwrapv by default makes sense because so much existing code the free software community has written (including critical code paths which fix security bugs) implicitly relies on -fwrapv.
