Daniel Berlin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Well, because Wiki is more attractive to people writing >> documentation for several reasons (faster than writing a HTML/TeX >> patch and submitting it for review, etc.). Maybe we should think if >> we want to use the Wiki as our rapid documentation prototyping: >> people could write documentation there for review, be refined by >> others, and eventually converted to real TeX documentation. > > This is what i did with the decl hierarchy documentation i submitted > as part of the decl cleanup patch. > > The Texinfo version took significantly longer than the wiki portion, > but it was mainly just mechanical formatting, etc, where wiki knows what > to do automatically or with a trivial command and Texinfo doesn't.
I believe we could conceive something to convert raw wiki text into texinfo with our commands. It would handle the boring part of the conversion. Giovanni Bajo
