On 2005-06-19 15:54:20 +0200, Gabriel Dos Reis wrote: > Vincent Lefevre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > | Yes, and if GCC developers think it is better to lie concerning the > | C standard comformance, this could be acceptable when such an option > | is given, but this should be clearly documented. According to the man > | page, this just means that the source is to be seen as C99 (what "the > | compiler accepts"). > > Now that you have equated GCC developers to liars, are you willing to > improve over the situation?
I haven't said that. Sorry if I wasn't clear enough. I meant that the gcc implementation lies about C standard comformance, and showed an example. Concerning the documentation, I'll put that on my todo list (now that I know a little more about what gcc does and when). You can see I've already posted comments on the documentation: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14708 But I'm not a GCC developer and doesn't know the GCC internals (I can just see the effects). So, producing a correct documentation could be a bit difficult for me. -- Vincent Lefèvre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - Web: <http://www.vinc17.org/> 100% accessible validated (X)HTML - Blog: <http://www.vinc17.org/blog/> Work: CR INRIA - computer arithmetic / SPACES project at LORIA
