On Jun 19, 2005 12:55 PM, Vincent Lefevre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 2005-06-19 11:47:16 +0200, Gabriel Dos Reis wrote: > > since you seem OK with that solution, would you mind preparing a patch? > > (discussions are not executables; someone needs to make things happen.) > > This is complete non-sense. One doesn't prepare a patch for an invalid > bug.
What exactly do you want to _achieve_ with this thread? Please, do tell, because you've completely lost most of us by now, I'm sure. I have re-closed PR323 now as SUSPENDED instead of INVALID because I find the messages from Jim Wilson, that Gaby pointed us to, convincing enough to admit that the problem is _also_ with gcc and not just with the x87 hardware. With a little serious effort on your part, you could have found those messages as well. But I'm fed up with the way you're participating in this discussion. In this mail I'm replying to, you say you don't want to prepare a patch for a bug that is marked INVALID. But in your previous mail, and throughout this discussion, you are arguing that the bug should not be marked INVALID to begin with. So by all means, pretty _please_, get your story consistent or quit arguing. And frankly, I _do_ expect a patch from you, now that PR323 is no longer marked invalid. If you don't post a patch, that will be the ultimate proof that you are just trolling here. Gr. Steven
