Eric Botcazou wrote: >1 new failure for libstdc++-v3 in 64-bit mode: > >FAIL: ext/array_allocator/2.cc execution test > >but *not* a regression. > > Indeed, I can confirm that: it's a very long standing issue ultimately due to basic_string not rebinding the allocator template argument to one sufficiently aligned. Fixing these issues within v6 (in the wide sense, i.e., also allowing interoperability between *.o) is basically impossible - it's already fixed in v7-branch, for both the available base classes.
Paolo.
