-------- Original Message -------- Subject: Re: gcc-4.0.1-b20050607.de.po [REJECTED]MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Sat, 18 Jun 2005 23:03:45 +0200 From: Roland Stigge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Organization: Antcom To: Translation Project Robot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Hi, one of our translators (Roland Stigge) reports a problem with the new gettext support of GCC formatting routines. In his file, msgfmt says >> gcc-4.0.1-b20050607.de.po:22804: 'msgstr' is not a valid GCC >> internal format string, unlike 'msgid'. Reason: In the directive >> number 1, the character '1' is not a valid conversion specifier. The lines in question are > msgid "Method %qs was defined with return type %qs in class %qs" > msgstr "Methode %1$qs wurde in Klasse %3$qs mit Rückgabetyp %2$qs definiert" and Roland writes > This worked before. Why shouldn't it? Please tell me how to work > around it except not using the n$ feature of standard format > strings. If GCC implements its own format strings, it should > at least support the standard feature set. So the questions are: - Does GCC support $ reordering of arguments? - If yes, why does gettext complain? - If no, shouldn't it? Regards, Martin
