Darn me all the heck. I said I wasn't going to say anything more... bad Scott, bad Scott!
> again and again and again and again (which i'm sure you'll say is us > "not listening to the user community", which is not the case). I hate to disappoint you, but those words won't grace this message. I understand the frustration. > We've also had people write to other mailing lists and say "plesae > mail-bomb the gcc list so they'll listen to us" And I have a homeless guy in Berkeley who takes great satisfaction in raking anything I do over the coals in various Usenet groups. We all have our crosses to bear... > ...we've become very unfriendly about the small number of people who > contend again and again that we should do it different, claiming simply > that any viewpoint than theirs is *wrong* and *bad* instead of "a > tradeoff that has been chosen". And they are *not* particularly polite > about it. My silly goal is to try an accomodate all viewpoints; providing a solution for bug 323 (for infamous example) could remove an irritant for all sides. Wouldn't that be a Good Thing? ..Scott (Who really will shut up now, until he presents some code.)
