[Redirecting off gdb-discuss again] On Tue, Jun 14, 2005 at 09:12:39PM -0400, Fred Fish wrote: > On Tuesday 14 June 2005 10:55, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > > better support for inline functions, which is already on the gdb > > roadmap > > Where's the roadmap? I'm just starting to look at this very issue > and would be good to know what is planned or in progress.
I was being figurative :-) We already know we need to do it. I already have a 30% or so hack which handles creating inline function frames. It works well enough for simple backtraces. But the symbol table side of it is all rotten, so it's not very useful - segfaults a lot. I also have the first 20% or so of setting breakpoints on multiple locations implemented, which is a necessary partner to that. But that's even less finished. Ask me if you want either set of code. The latest version of the latter is in the gdb-patches archive from early this year. I don't think I ever posted the former - too gross. If you want to work on anything without duplicating effort, it behooves _you_ to discuss it on the mailing lists first. -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery, LLC
