> I don't care if it's spelt warn_foo, OPT_Wfoo, warning_p(foo) or > whatever, so long as it's spelt only one way. The 'warning > (OPT_Wfoo, ...)' syntax helps only where there is no conditional > before the warning -- how often does that occur? The way it > currently is, one runs the risk of writing
It's confusing now because it's in transition. Eventually, the use of warn_foo will become rare, and the OPT_foo will be the preferred method of controlling diagnostics. Only 664 more warnings to go!
