Vincent Lefevre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> On 2005-06-01 00:58:25 +0200, Andreas Schwab wrote:
>> #include <assert.h>
>> #include <float.h>
>> 
>> long double one = 1.0;
>> long double one_plus_eps;
>> 
>> int
>> main (void)
>> {
>>   long double one_plus_eps;
>> 
>>   one_plus_eps = one + LDBL_EPSILON;
>>   assert (one != one_plus_eps);
>>   return 0;
>> }
>
> I don't know how the standard should be interpreted (see below), but
> if your program fails, this means that either your program is buggy
> or the C implemention is buggy.

This works fine with a non-broken implementation which claims IEC 60559
compliance.

Andreas.

-- 
Andreas Schwab, SuSE Labs, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
SuSE Linux Products GmbH, Maxfeldstraße 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany
Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756  01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5
"And now for something completely different."

Reply via email to