On 2005-05-31 13:16:55 +0100, Andrew Haley wrote: > Vincent Lefevre writes: > > According to 5.1.2.3#13, 6.3.1.5#2 and 6.3.1.8#2, the assert should > > not fail (unless the division yields a NaN, but that would be a very > > bad implementation anyway). > > I have read the sections you mention, and I cannot see how they imply > what you write. Can you explain, please?
Well, concerning the first reference, it should be 5.1.2.3#12. Concerning 6.3.1.8#2, see the footnote (52). -- Vincent Lefèvre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - Web: <http://www.vinc17.org/> 100% accessible validated (X)HTML - Blog: <http://www.vinc17.org/blog/> Work: CR INRIA - computer arithmetic / SPACES project at LORIA
