On Mon, 2005-05-23 at 10:00 -0600, Jeffrey A Law wrote: > On Mon, 2005-05-23 at 11:42 -0400, Eric Christopher wrote: > > > Eric (and anyone else who wasn't aware): there's been a lot of > > > discussion about this on gcc-patches since I posted that message: > > > > > > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2005-05/msg02029.html > > > > > > It's also PR21638: > > > > > > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21638 > > > > > > It looks like Andrew, Jeff and Daniel have got things in hand > > > but no patch has been committed yet. > > > > Interesting. I'll look. Thanks. > I'm slogging through the missing calls to recompute invariant-ness, > and the like right now. Depending on how much longer this goes, I may > go ahead with adding all the missing calls w/o installing the checking > portion of the patch. >
Originally, this is one of the reasons the patch was not committed: There were places in fortran that weren't clean, etc, and i just didn't have time to go hunting (which is why i posted it to gcc patches, and left it out there for whoever wanted it). Though apparently, not checking this stuff has led us to arguably worse consequences. So i'm a little wary of not installing the patch at some point soon, although i understand we all have time constraints. --Dan
