On Fri, 20 May 2005, Gary Funck wrote: > OK, thanks. I (now) understand that the reference to a warning about a > missing protoype > does not apply. However, I don't see anything in section 6.5.2.2 > (rev. 1999-12-01) that says that a function declaration or prototype > declaration must (or should) precede a call to the function. And GCC isn't > treating it
That's because it's 6.5.1 paragraph 2: only declared identifiers are valid in expressions. > as an error, but rather is enabling the warning by default. Because C90 permitted this, we guess what you meant. However, by choosing C99 mode you're giving a strong indication that you should not be using any feature removed in C99, so we warn, or give an error with -pedantic-errors. -- Joseph S. Myers http://www.srcf.ucam.org/~jsm28/gcc/ [EMAIL PROTECTED] (personal mail) [EMAIL PROTECTED] (CodeSourcery mail) [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Bugzilla assignments and CCs)
