On Wed, 18 May 2005, Richard Sandiford wrote:
> "Joseph S. Myers" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > For example, "Results for 4.1.020050506(experimental) testsuite on
> > mips64-unknown-elf" with the components of the version number all run
> > together
> > [...]
> > Ensuring your test results
> > use the standard Subject header format makes it more likely they can
> > handled properly by sites processing the gcc-testresults postings into
> > databases of GCC test status on different targets (such as
> > <http://www.toolchain.org/testresults/index.html> but other sites have
> > done this sort of thing before and may do so in future).
>
> FWIW, those mips messages _were_ sent with test_summary. I'm not
> sure why they got mangled. Are there any known issues that would
> cause that?
What awk version are you using? (The script tests for gawk, nawk, awk if
$AWK is not set.) Experimenting suggests that mawk is deficient in this
regard: where the script extracts the version number
$2 == "version" { save = $0; $1 = ""; $2 = ""; version = $0; gsub(/^ */,
"", version); gsub(/\r$/, "", version); $0 = save; }
mawk loses the spaces whereas gawk or nawk do not.
--
Joseph S. Myers http://www.srcf.ucam.org/~jsm28/gcc/
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (personal mail)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (CodeSourcery mail)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Bugzilla assignments and CCs)
