William Beebe writes: > >... If you want what LXR provides (and yes, I looked it up) then get Doxygen.... >
Not only does Doxygen not meet my requirements, but also it doesn't make much sense to me for each cross-reference tool to implement its own source code parser and symbol database when the symbol information could be (optionally) output by the compiler and subsequently processed into a database file by a utility program. But, I guess we'll just have to agree to disagree. > >... why don't you write that cross-reference output feature? > Is anyone else planning on or interested in adding a symbol cross-reference option to gcc for the "C" programming language? Are there any objections to adding a symbol cross-reference option to gcc for the "C" programming language?
