On Wed, May 11, 2005 at 11:58:39AM -0700, Greg McGary wrote: > Daniel Jacobowitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > ... Or you could try telling the entire compiler to treat them as > > registers, instead of just reload. That's likely to work as well or > > better. > > So, I define these as a separate register class, and only the movM > insn patterns get constraints that match them, right? Anything else?
That would work; for good results, though, you may also need to modify any predicates which check hard registers. > Should I tack them onto the end of REG_ALLOC_ORDER, or leave them > off? End. -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery, LLC
