>>>>> "Rutger" == Rutger Ovidius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
RH> But still largely useless. Who in their right mind is going to RH> use an 83MB static library when a shared library is available. Rutger> Everyone on win32 builds libgcj static, and probably wants to keep it Rutger> that way if they plan to distribute their apps. I thought the reason everybody on win32 built static was that there was no choice. Is it really preferable? I'm sympathetic to folks who want static builds for various reasons. I wouldn't mind an option to allow libgcj to be built in some reduced form, either; though it would be up to the folks using this mode to maintain it. Tom
