On 2005-04-27 15:30:39 +0200, Gabriel Dos Reis wrote: > Vincent Lefevre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > [...] > > | > > But if they are never modified, they evaluate to constants, right? > | > > > | > > The fact that they are not considered as constant expressions, > | > > is it due to the fact that the environment is allowed to modify > | > > them? > | > > | > It's due to what the C standard says. A const variable in C isn't a > | > constant, it's just a read-only variable. > | > | 1+1 isn't a constant either > > It is an integer constant expression, and its evaluation yields a > constant (see 6.6). Can you explain why you believe that is false?
I never said that it was false. Could you please read messages before replying? -- Vincent Lefèvre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - Web: <http://www.vinc17.org/> 100% accessible validated (X)HTML - Blog: <http://www.vinc17.org/blog/> Work: CR INRIA - computer arithmetic / SPACES project at LORIA
