On Wed, 2005-04-20 at 01:18, Josh Conner wrote: > On Apr 18, 2005, at 3:12 PM, Julian Brown wrote: > > > Results for arm-none-elf, cross-compiled from i686-pc-linux-gnu > > (Debian) > > for C and C++ are here: > > > > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2005-04/msg01301.html > > > > Relative to RC1, there are several new tests which pass, and: > > > > g++.dg/warn/Wdtor1.C (test for excess errors) > > > > works whereas it didn't before. > > > > Julian > > > > Has there been any discussion of builtin-bitops-1.c failing for > arm-none-elf with RC1 + RC2? It's a moderately serious regression from > 3.4.3 -- we're no longer correctly calculating the size of load double > instructions, and so the constant pool is generated at an address that > is out of range of the instructions that use them. It will show up in > moderately large functions that use double word constants.
It's fixed on mainline and I'll probably backport the patch to 4.0.1. As I said at the time I committed the mainline patch, it was too invasive to commit right before 4.0.0 was released. It's been on mainline for a couple of weeks now, and I don't think it's shown up any problems, so now is probably the right time to be back-porting it. R.
