On Wed, 6 Apr 2005, Joseph S. Myers wrote: > (If test results for a port are so bad that > though sent to gcc-testresults they exceed the message size limit, and > this remains the case for a prolonged period such as ever since 4.0 > branched, that also indicates lack of active maintenance.)
No, it could just as well be a problem with the library, as is the case for libgfortran; tests still run even though it's disabled for mmix-knuth-mmixware. (There's a PR about it somewhere, IIRC.) Having said that, I do *not* consider it a requirement or equivalent for port maintenance to send test-results to gcc-testresults at any specific time or interval. For simulators with free components, people can run the tests themselves if they're interested. brgds, H-P
