> From: Paul Schlie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> some-const-char*-funct("abc"); // "C.x[4] = {'a','b','c',0} array
> // of "literal static const data"
> // some-const-char*-funct(C.x);
Or rather I suspect it implies the allocation of a temporary to store
C.x[] into then passing the reference to the temporary (as there seems to
be no present way to define a function parameter which points to a "literal
static const data" object, vs. a generic allocated const object, because
although "static const char s[]" may denote an array of "literal static
const data", funct(static const char *) is interpreted as attempting to
declare the storage class of the pointer parameter, as opposed to qualifying
the storage class of the object it's pointing to)?
