On Wednesday 13 April 2005 22:52, Pat Haugen wrote: > Back to the original problem with the algorithm using edge frequency vs. > block frequency. Would you agree that the correct thing to do is fix the > code so that it uses block frequency, especially since the patch of > Zdenek's you referenced takes care of the original problem I saw when doing > so?
My understanding of what you propose is that you want to use the dest block frequency as the tie-breaker in the case that both edges have the same probability. Right? I think this would be reasonable. Not my decision to make, though ;-) Gr. Steven P.S. I wonder why the code for the best edge in tracer.c:better_p is not the same as the code in bb-reorder -- or why we have two trace finding algorithms in one compiler... Honza??
