----Original Message---- >From: Bernardo Innocenti >Sent: 13 April 2005 08:05
> Zack Weinberg wrote: >> "Dave Korn" writes: >> >> >>> No write perms mate! However I'll check out HEAD and do a >>> before-and-after testsuite run overnight, and get back to you in the >>> morning with the results (UK time). Will "--enable-languages=c,c++" be >>> enough, or do you want me to test against all default languages? >> >> >> For this, c/c++ should be fine. > > Are you serious? Such a dangerous patch surely ought > to be fully regtested with all languages enabled and > *at* *least* using: > > - a cc0 target > - a big-endian target > - a 64bit target > - the mmix and vax backends > - the new-ra branch > - the POOMA testsuite > > :-) Oh yes, indeed! I'm also testing with both Fortrans, Cobol, Java, and Ada, and liasing with the gcl and LLVM folks, to make sure it doesn't break their stuff, and I heard about a bloke in Outer Mongolia who has a custom port of gcc to a gnu-yurt-yak-abacus target, and I'm quite worried about breaking his backend... (those Yaks can give you one hell of a kick!) cheers, DaveK -- Can't think of a witty .sigline today....