Daniel Jacobowitz dixit: >On Mon, Apr 11, 2005 at 10:02:06AM -0700, Daniel Kegel wrote: >> BTW, I hope -fno-unit-at-a-time doesn't go away until at least gcc-4.1.1 >> or so... I still lean on that crutch. > >A user! Can you explain why?
If you're "just" looking for users: I need -fno-unit-at-a-time because -funit-at-a-time in 3.4 breaks ProPolice. Of course, that's totally non-standard, and ProPolice will have to be redesigned for gcc 4 anyway, IIRC. (Also, with -funit-at-a-time, I get .L123 symbols in the generated shared libraries, which I do not get without.) Probably not too much importance, I just wanted to speak up I guess. bye, //mirabile
