Nathan Sidwell writes: > Andrew Haley wrote: > > > Might it still be possible for a front end to force all pending code > > to be generated, even with -fno-unit-at-a-time gone? > > I think this is a bad idea. You're essentially asking for the backend > to retain all the functionality of -fno-unit-at-a-time.
OK. So, what else? > Might I refer you to Mike Stump's answer regarding swap :) I haven't seen it. Andrew.
