I'm having a little difficulty understanding what this is for. Is it that gcc's builtin memcpy expander generates bad code, or that older versions of gcc generate bad code, or what? gcc generates too much code?
Andrew.
I'm having a little difficulty understanding what this is for. Is it that gcc's builtin memcpy expander generates bad code, or that older versions of gcc generate bad code, or what? gcc generates too much code?
Andrew.