On Apr 4, 2005, at 2:33 PM, Andrew Pinski wrote:
On Apr 4, 2005, at 1:01 PM, Andrew Haley wrote:
Giovanni Bajo writes:Is __alignof__( ::java::lang::Object ) the same under 3.4 and 4.0 in the
first place?
Yes, 4 in both cases.
And here is the most reduced testcase (and it shows that the C and C++ front-ends don't agree any more which is bad):
Using the following compile time testcase (only for x86-pc-linux-gnu): typedef struct Parent { long long m; int *scratch; void * __attribute__((aligned(8))) this$0; }Parent;
int f[sizeof(Parent)!=24?-1:1];
I found that this started to be rejected between 2004-06-22-trunk (#470) and 2004-06-24-trunk (#471).
I used Phil's regression hunter: <http://www.devphil.com/~reghunt/>.
Thanks, Andrew Pinski
