On Apr 1, 2005 9:36 PM, Mark Mitchell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Diego Novillo wrote:
On Fri, Apr 01, 2005 at 11:24:06AM -0800, Mark Mitchell wrote:
Dale Johannesen wrote:
So I guess question 1 is, Mark, do you feel negatively enough about this feature to block its acceptance in mainline?
I'm not sure that I *could* block it, but, no, I don't feel that negatively.
I don't mind either way. But I do have a question, what's the granularity of this #pragma? Function-level, I hope?
That's what I assumed. Anything finer than that is insane. :-)
Well, if we're inventing something that can annotate functions we may as well invent it in a way that it can be extended to handle statement annotations. Just like for
for (;;) #pragma inline foo();
The concept I was calling insane was trying to optimize the first half of a function with -O2 and the second half with -O0.
Your example is different; you're talking about how to treat the call to "foo", not how to optimize the entire function (including the "for"). Something like what you're suggesting doesn't seem entirely unreasonable to me.
-- Mark Mitchell CodeSourcery, LLC [EMAIL PROTECTED] (916) 791-8304
