On Thu, 31 Mar 2005, Ajoy K Thamattoor wrote: > > A colleague of mine pointed out gcc gave warnings on the following > constructs. I understand a strictly conforming implementation is allowed > to warn on anything, but some of these are actually valid constructs. > Wanted clarification on why gcc wants to provide sequence-point warnings > on these. Please cc me on the response, since I am not subscribed to the > list...
I don't think you understand what dg-bogus means. You are quoting from gcc.dg/sequence-pt-1.c and dg-bogus is testing that GCC *doesn't* warn for those constructs. And, indeed, the test passes: GCC does not warn for these constructs. If you have a genuine bug in -Wsequence-point, report it to GCC Bugzilla with a complete testcase to reproduce the bug. -- Joseph S. Myers http://www.srcf.ucam.org/~jsm28/gcc/ [EMAIL PROTECTED] (personal mail) [EMAIL PROTECTED] (CodeSourcery mail) [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Bugzilla assignments and CCs)
