> OK. (FWIW, you're not on the CC: list for that PR either.) No, but I'm the assignee so... :-)
> > Note that the patch has been approved by Roger for 4.x, so it should > > already have been checked in, had I not run into technical contingencies > > lately. > > Great; I shan't second-guess then. Sorry, I only wanted to explain why the patch is still pending. About your question: am I right in thinking that the real name is the name as written in the assembly file? If so, that's what is now implemented in 4.x. > > However the same problem is present in 3.4.x for the C++ compiler (but > > is not a regression there) so I'd like you to make a decision for that > > branch too. > > I'd prefer not to apply this for 3.4. Agreed. -- Eric Botcazou
