Hello, > VIEW_CONVERT_EXPR is tcc_reference, but we can have a statement like: > > x = <VIEW_CONVERT_EXPR some_type> 22;
what is the semantics of this expression? Should not this rather be x = <NOP_EXPR some_type> 22 (or just INTEGER_CST:some_type 22)? Zdenek > What ends up happening here is that find_interesting_uses_stmt calls > find_interesting_uses_address, which goes down the references and > runs into the constant, which it doesn't know how to handle. I think > the simplest fix is below. It's certainly safe in that it converts > an ICE into not aborting and seems to do the right thing. The test case > is in Ada and proprietary and it didn't seem worthwhile to make a small > one for something this simple. > > Does the following look correct? > > *** tree-ssa-loop-im.c 11 Mar 2005 09:05:10 -0000 2.31 > --- tree-ssa-loop-im.c 19 Mar 2005 00:12:02 -0000 > *************** for_each_index (tree *addr_p, bool (*cbc > *** 195,198 **** > --- 195,199 ---- > case STRING_CST: > case RESULT_DECL: > + case INTEGER_CST: > return true; >
