----Original Message---- >From: Ronny Peine >Sent: 16 March 2005 17:34
> See for example: > http://mathworld.wolfram.com/ExponentLaws.html > Ok, I did. >Even though, gcc returns 1 for pow(0.0,0.0) in version 3.4.3 like many >other c-compiler do. The same behaviour would be expected from cpow. No, you're wrong (that the same behaviour would be expected from cpow). See for example: http://mathworld.wolfram.com/ExponentLaws.html " Note that these rules apply in general only to real quantities, and can give manifestly wrong results if they are blindly applied to complex quantities. " <g> cheers, DaveK -- Can't think of a witty .sigline today....
