Robert Dewar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | Marc Espie wrote: | > In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you write: | > | >>Well as I said above, trampolines or an equivalent are currently critically | >>needed by some front ends (and of course by anyone using the (very useful IMO) | >>extension of nested functions in C). | > This is your opinion, but I've yet to find an actual piece of code | > in a | > real project that uses that extension. | | I have certainly seen it used, but you may well be right that it is | seldom used. It is certainly reasonable to consider removing this | extension from C and C++. Anyone using that feature? Or know anyone | who is.
GNU C++ does not have nested functions. Standard C++ local classes provide good support, IMHO. -- Gaby
